Has anyone checked the original paper in detail? Specifically, how confident are we that the results are not just random noise + p-hacking? For example, at a glance, I am not super-impressed by these plots:
Video S1 kinda looks real, and they say it’s “representative” (as opposed to cherry-picked), but they don’t say anything specific to pin down what “representative” means, which makes me suspicious that it was in fact cherry-picked.