# NUPIC Performance

**URL:** <https://discourse.numenta.org/t/nupic-performance/2319>\
**Category:** NuPIC\
**Tags:** nupic\
**Created:** [May 14, 2017, 11:43pm UTC](https://discourse.numenta.org/t/nupic-performance/2319 "2017-05-14T23:43:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![viswanathk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/c6cbf5/32.png) [@viswanathk](https://discourse.numenta.org/u/viswanathk)\
**Post date:** [May 14, 2017, 11:43pm UTC](https://discourse.numenta.org/t/nupic-performance/2319/1 "2017-05-14T23:43:05Z")

</div>

Are there any benchmarked performance metrics for NUPIC? I want to measure the throughput of anomaly scores and I noticed that it is around 15-20 anomaly scores per second - for one model or multiple models.

I am not sure if I am facing a bottleneck somewhere or the performance of NUPIC is something similar

Machine specs : 4 Cores, 14 GB Memory

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rhyolight](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/discourse.numenta.org/rhyolight/32/3922_2.png) [@rhyolight](https://discourse.numenta.org/u/rhyolight)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2017, 4:14pm UTC](https://discourse.numenta.org/t/nupic-performance/2319/2 "2017-05-15T16:14:16Z")

</div>

No, I don’t think so. If you put anything together, please share?