To me, it’s odd to say that others are copying you and not giving credit. It’s quite possible that other intelligent people such as yourself are arriving at similar conclusions (which is actually a good thing).
At the same time, ask what your motivation is. Is it that you become world famous and renowned? Or are you trying to serve some other higher goal of scientific discovery?
I agree with Mr. Lamb here… I would love to learn more about your take on all this, but you’re going to have to put work into it, starting a new thread and outline in minute (I’d say painstaking) detail how your perspective works, how different components interact, how information moves from one region to another (while not forgetting biological constraints, if you’re using a biological basis), then be open to constructive questions, criticisms, or challenges. Or maybe we’ll just love and accept it.
Make it easy to find your idea, in a single unified place, where you can keep updating and growing your post. We’d all benefit this way, including yourself.
Either way, that would be a more unified approach to consolidate your idea on AGI, rather than tidbits scattered about, or accusations of others copying your ideas (when it’s possible that they have come to the same conclusions independently).
For AGI, I’m personally open to any approach that works. Any AGI is going to be the culmination of giants standing on the shoulders of countless other giants, rather than a single-person act. Because of that, don’t shoot or disparage others who are working in the same ideas as you. United we stand and all that…